Football ConceptsGeneral Football

Part 2 : Attackers’ Confidence

How Important Is It?

The second shift is from proactive to reactive play. Confidence lets attackers gamble, creating a tendency to attack crosses before the ball is delivered. They anticipate chaos. Low-confidence attackers meanwhile wait, because they want confirmation but by the time the ball arrives, they are half a step late. Body language completes the loop. Shoulders drop. Gestures become apologetic. Defenders sense this immediately and marking becomes tighter, the defender feels he can bully the attacker and the duels become more physical. The attacker is essentially treated as prey. Confidence loss is contagious. Once defenders believe you doubt yourself, they act accordingly.

Modern football is uniquely hostile to fragile confidence, especially for attackers. The game has always punished missed chances, but it has never documented them this aggressively. Every shot is now archived, measured, and contextualized against expectation. The striker does not just miss, he underperforms publicly. Expected Goals has value analytically, but psychologically it is brutal. A forward knows when he has missed a “big chance”. He does not need the stat, but the stat ensures he cannot escape it. The miss is no longer a moment, it becomes a data point that follows him into every discussion.

This creates a loop. Misses generate scrutiny, scrutiny tightens decision-making and tight decision-making produces worse shots. Worse shots confirm the narrative. The player begins to play not to score, but to avoid confirming the story already written about him.

Social media accelerates this collapse. A goal drought is no longer a quiet internal struggle. It is a daily countdown, a graphic, a compilation. The striker walks onto the pitch already aware of the joke he will become if he misses again. That awareness does not sit at the back of the mind. It sits in the chest. This pressure changes how teammates interact as well. Passes arrive later. Options dry up quicker. Teammates may not consciously distrust the striker, but footballers sense fragility. They choose safer options when belief drains from the collective.

Managers, too, become part of the loop. Public backing is often louder when belief is already fading. Phrases like “he just needs one” sound supportive but subtly confirm the problem. The striker hears it as confirmation that his status is conditional. Age and status affect this differently. Young attackers feel exposure, fear of being written off before arrival. Older attackers feel erosion, fear that decline is being mistaken for form. In both cases, the anxiety is existential. It is about relevance, not just goals.

This is why confidence collapses faster now than in previous eras. There is no quiet space to rebuild. Every miss is watched, clipped, debated, and stored. The attacker is never alone with his own process. The best managers understand that you cannot talk a player into confidence. You have to remove friction.

The first step is simplification. Fewer instructions. Clear zones. Reduced decision trees. Give the attacker tasks that cannot fail. Hold the ball. Press. Combine. Win fouls. Touches before outcomes. Rhythm matters more than redemption. Confidence returns through repetition, not highlight moments. Five clean layoffs do more than one scrappy finish. Modern psychology leans heavily on immediacy. Miss, then move on. No replay. No internal audit. The “goldfish” concept is not about stupidity. It is about speed of emotional deletion. Once the mind quiets, instinct creeps back in.

Ollie Watkins at the start of the season was a textbook example of confidence erosion without technical decline. Physically, nothing was wrong. His movement remained sharp. His pressing was relentless. But in front of goal, everything slowed. He took extra touches. He hesitated on finishes he normally strikes first time. His shots drifted centrally. The goals dried up. What stood out most was his body language. Watkins began arriving in the box a fraction later. Not because he could not run, but because he was waiting for certainty. He was playing to avoid mistakes, not to cause damage.

The noise followed quickly. Expected Goals discourse. Miss compilations. Questions about form. None of it was outrageous, but all of it was cumulative. The turning point was not a spectacular goal. It was a stretch of matches where his role subtly shifted. More involvement outside the box. More link play. Less fixation on finishing actions. He was allowed to be useful without being decisive. And then, quietly, the shots came earlier again. The runs sharpened. The keeper stopped being the focal point. The ball left his foot without ceremony. Nothing magical happened. Permission returned. That is always the real breakthrough. Not belief. Not confidence speeches. Just the absence of fear.

Confidence in attackers is not a personality trait. It is a temporary neurological state. It can vanish without warning and return without announcement. The most dangerous forwards are not just the most gifted. They are the ones whose minds stay silent long enough for instinct to speak. Once an attacker starts internally asking for permission, the advantage is gone. And once they stop asking, the game opens back up.

Christian Olorunda

Christian Olorunda is a football analyst specializing in tactical trends and the financial evolution of the African and European game. As someone who has watched football since his childhood, writing about it and researching players and clubs has always come easy to him. Through his writing and research, he has shaped his opinions and that of others when needed. He started writing in 2022 and hasn't looked back since, with over 500 articles published in various journals and blogs. Follow his analysis on X (https://x.com/theFootballBias).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button