UEFA Champions League

Tac-Talk : How Liverpool Beat Marseille

Comfortable Win For The Reds

The Stade Vélodrome is widely regarded as one of the most hostile environments in European football, a cauldron where tactical plans often melt under the sheer intensity of the home support. Yet, yesterday evening, Arne Slot’s Liverpool provided a masterclass in professional composure, securing a 3–0 victory that was as much a triumph of the mind as it was of the feet. While the final scoreline suggests a routine win, the statistical reality reveals a fascinating tactical duel where Liverpool allowed Marseille to hold the ball, only to punish them with a tactical squeeze that left Roberto De Zerbi’s side looking increasingly toothless as the night progressed.

The foundation of Liverpool’s victory was built upon a specific tactical tweak involving their full-backs. Knowing that Marseille would attempt to suffocate the center of the pitch with their high press, Slot granted Jeremie Frimpong and Milos Kerkez immense freedom to operate as secondary wingers. To facilitate this, Ryan Gravenberch was tasked with dropping deep into a “quarterback” role, providing a defensive screen that allowed the full-backs to bypass Marseille’s midfield lines.

The impact of this system was most evident in the second goal. In the 72nd minute, Frimpong found himself deep in the attacking third, driving to the byline with the kind of verticality Marseille simply could not track. His hard, low cross forced a deflection off goalkeeper Gerónimo Rulli, resulting in an own goal that effectively broke the spirit of the French side. Tactically, Liverpool completed 412 passes compared to Marseille’s 572, but Liverpool’s distribution was far more purposeful, focusing on exploiting the space behind Marseille’s adventurous wing-backs.

Often in Champions League football, the timing of a goal is often as important as its execution. For the first forty-five minutes, Marseille had been the more active side, buoyed by 58% possession and a series of speculative efforts. However, on the stroke of halftime, Dominik Szoboszlai produced a moment of psychological brilliance. Faced with a Marseille wall that was clearly coached to jump, Szoboszlai opted for a cheeky low strike that went underneath the defenders and trickled into the bottom corner.

The psychological impact of going into the break 1–0 down after a half of territorial dominance was terminal for Marseille. It turned their 572 passes into a source of frustration rather than a weapon. From that point on, every Marseille error felt magnified. Even when they managed to carve out an opening, the mental weight of the scoreboard began to influence their decision-making.

The nature of the statistics highlights a massive disparity in clinical edge. Marseille registered 15 shots to Liverpool’s 11, yet their Expected Goals (xG) sat at a meager 0.87 compared to Liverpool’s 1.46. This 0.87 xG from 15 shots indicates a high volume of low-probability efforts, a symptom of a Marseille build-up that was horizontally heavy but vertically ineffective.

The return of Mohamed Salah played a crucial psychological role here. Although the Egyptian did not find the net, his first start since November following AFCON forced the Marseille defense to remain pinned back, creating the necessary pockets for Florian Wirtz and later Cody Gakpo to exploit. In the center of the defense, Joe Gomez, stepping in for the absent Ibrahima Konaté, produced a nearly flawless display of concentration. By recording 17 tackles as a unit, Liverpool’s defense ensured that Marseille’s three big chances never translated into genuine scoreboard pressure.

As the match entered its final phase, the tactical maturity of this Liverpool side was on full display. While Marseille threw bodies forward in a desperate kitchen sink attempt to find a lifeline, Liverpool remained patient, recording eight fouls to Marseille’s 12 as they professionally managed the environment.

The final act in the 93rd minute was a masterpiece of transition football. Ryan Gravenberch, who had been the tactical anchor for 90 minutes, drove through a fatigued Marseille midfield before feeding Cody Gakpo. Gakpo’s clinical finish into the far corner was the ultimate sucker punch, a goal that rewarded Liverpool’s tactical discipline and punished Marseille’s late-game desperation. By the time the final whistle blew, Alisson Becker had been required to make four saves, but the outcome had long since been decided in the tactical and psychological skirmishes of the mid-block.

Liverpool won yesterday because they were comfortable being “outplayed” on the ball in order to dominate the scoreline. They moved to 15 points and into 4th place in the Champions League table not by chasing the game, but by allowing the game to come to them.

Through the tactical ingenuity of Slot’s full-backs and the psychological resilience shown during the VAR delays and the hostile atmosphere, Liverpool proved they are a machine built for the clinical realities of the knockout stages. Marseille showed signs of life, but their lack of proper creativity in the final third stood in stark contrast to a Liverpool side that scored three goals from just 1.46 xG. In the end, the weight of Liverpool’s tactical clarity proved too heavy for a Marseille side that had the ball, but never the match.

Christian Olorunda

Christian Olorunda is a football analyst specializing in tactical trends and the financial evolution of the African and European game. As someone who has watched football since his childhood, writing about it and researching players and clubs has always come easy to him. Through his writing and research, he has shaped his opinions and that of others when needed. He started writing in 2022 and hasn't looked back since, with over 500 articles published in various journals and blogs. Follow his analysis on X (https://x.com/theFootballBias).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button